A thought
that occurred to me when reading the book, more specifically chapter 5, was
that the notion of using personas for
designing for different demographics is simply basing your design on
prejudices. I believe that this could be a handy tool in the later stages of
the design process, but that it should be strictly complementary to the rest of
the research.
When it comes
to our situation in the group project, I think that we should make a hunt statement that we can proceed from.
We should also form a moderator script for
the interviews.
After
conducting the interviews, we need to structure the data in some way to get a
good overview of what we have to work with, and to be able to distinguish
patterns. However, since we do not have an office or a room which is dedicated
to the project.
Another
reflection that I made while reading, was that there are a lot of different
approaches to designing something. It also got me thinking about what method we
are going to use in this project. I think that I would instinctively go for the
genius approach and draw conclusions from my own experience within the subject.
However, I don’t think this is the way to go about the task in this project,
since we are focusing on museums and I don’t have too much experience within
this field. I believe that a user-centered design would be more ideal in this
case.
Question
for the seminar: How can we pinpoint the faults in a system or where there is
room for improvement if the user doesn’t experience any? Also, how do we
identify a need or want in a user that the user themselves does not know they
possess?
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar